The Rox alternative with the phones, the CRM and one flat price
SAGARIS is a Rox alternative for teams that want AI running the phones, the inbox and the CRM as one governed system. The price is flat and published: $499 per seat per month, with no usage meter and no monthly allowance to model. Both companies publish prices, which is rare in this category. The models are what differ.
Rox facts checked against rox.com's own published pages on August 18, 2026
SAGARIS vs Rox, on the facts
| Dimension | SAGARIS | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Published pricing | $499 per seat per month, flat, printed in plain server-rendered HTML on our pricing page. | Published: $100 per month Individual and $255 per month Teams with unlimited seats, metered at 10,000 and 15,000 Agent Actions per month, plus a custom Enterprise tier (checked August 18, 2026). |
| Pricing model | Per seat, flat. No usage meter, no monthly reset. Monthly on the founding plan, cancel anytime. | Usage and outcome based. Its own FAQ says you pay for outcomes measured in units called Agent Actions, and the tier allowances are per month. |
| Scope | One system: CRM, parallel dialer, email inbox, SMS, social workflows, AI receptionist, AI coach and analytics. | An agent layer for account intelligence, revenue intelligence, sales engagement and conversation intelligence, with CRM sync and writeback to the stack you already run. |
| Telephony and inbound voice | Our own rails: parallel dialing on your own number pools with a hard 50-dials-per-number daily cap, live coaching, and an AI receptionist answering real inbound calls. | Not among the platform surfaces rox.com describes on its own pages (checked August 18, 2026). |
| CRM | Included. Calls, emails and texts log themselves to one record with one brain across channels. | Sits on the CRM you keep. CRM sync and writeback arrive on the Teams tier. |
| Who it is built for | Sales teams that want the whole engine at a known monthly cost, with the phones inside it. | Its homepage title says it plainly: Revenue Agents for the Global 2000. SAML, SCIM and SSO are gated to the Enterprise tier. |
Where the phones are
The clearest product difference is voice. SAGARIS ships its own telephony. Parallel dialing on number pools provisioned to you, with a hard 50-dials-per-number daily cap. Live coaching during the call. Voicemail drops. And an AI receptionist that answers real inbound calls, qualifies the caller and books the meeting.
The platform surfaces rox.com describes on its own pages are account intelligence, revenue intelligence, sales engagement and conversation intelligence. Telephony is not among them (checked August 18, 2026). If your motion is calls-first, that is the fork in the road. One product treats the phone as the center of the workflow. Buy the one whose center matches yours.
A flat seat, with nothing to meter
Rox meters work in Agent Actions, with a monthly allowance on each tier, and its own FAQ describes the model as usage and outcome based. Your spend follows how much agent work you consume.
SAGARIS charges one number per seat and meters nothing. Run the dialer all day. Let the receptionist answer every inbound call. The invoice does not move. And because the $499 includes the CRM and the telephony rails, the real comparison is against the CRM, dialer and phone stack you would otherwise still be paying for underneath.
Predictable billing changes how a team uses the product, which is the part that shows up in pipeline. Nobody rations dials near the end of the month. Nobody leaves the receptionist switched off to protect an allowance. Your reps work the list as hard as they can, and the finance conversation is one number times headcount.
Agents that do the work, under gates you can see
Rox and SAGARIS agree on two things this category still resists. Both publish real prices on a public page, and both bet that AI agents should do revenue work rather than summarise it.
The difference is what the agents reach. At SAGARIS they reach the whole motion: the CRM, the dialer, the inbox, the SMS line and the inbound receptionist, all one system. A graduated autonomy ladder decides what they may do alone, approval gates hold the rest, and every agent action lands in an audit trail you can read.
Who should pick which
An agent layer on its own may be enough if...
Here is when a layer on top of what you already own is the right shape.
- You run an enterprise motion and want agents working account research on top of a stack you are keeping.
- You would rather budget by usage than by seat, and modelling a monthly allowance suits how you plan.
- Your motion is not calls-first, so telephony and inbound voice are not part of what you are buying.
Choose SAGARIS if...
The trade runs the other way when you want the engine, not another layer.
- You want the phones: a parallel dialer on number pools you control and an AI receptionist answering real inbound calls, in the same system as the CRM.
- You want one flat, published number per seat, with no usage meter to watch and no monthly allowance to model.
- You want human-in-the-loop as inspectable mechanism: a graduated autonomy ladder, approval gates, a hard guard against auto-sending outside approved lanes and an audit trail.
- You want the CRM included rather than synced to.
Rox questions, answered plainly.
The questions buyers actually type when they compare the two. Where we do not know, we say so.
- MOST ASKED
Yes, if you want the AI to run the whole revenue motion, phones and CRM included, at a flat published $499 per seat per month with nothing metered.